That’s Not How the Force Works

img_02761(And the Educational Razzie Mummified Banana Statuette goes to….)

A post to start the New Year:

Here’s the thing: You can’t just grab any kid off the desert sands, throw him in the pod racer, and say, “Fly!!”

You can feed a third-grader nuclear physics all day long. You can throw in a dose of calculus for engineers. Perhaps a soupçon de Mandarin Chinese? Whatever. I return to a favorite saying: There is no teaching without learning.

From  http://www.corestandards.org/Math/Content/1/introduction/, I offer the Common Core math standards for the first grade. Feel free to mostly skim these. I recommend looking at mathematical practices, though.

Grade 1 » Introduction

Print this page

In Grade 1, instructional time should focus on four critical areas: (1) developing understanding of addition, subtraction, and strategies for addition and subtraction within 20; (2) developing understanding of whole number relationships and place value, including grouping in tens and ones; (3) developing understanding of linear measurement and measuring lengths as iterating length units; and (4) reasoning about attributes of, and composing and decomposing geometric shapes.

  1. Students develop strategies for adding and subtracting whole numbers based on their prior work with small numbers. They use a variety of models, including discrete objects and length-based models (e.g., cubes connected to form lengths), to model add-to, take-from, put-together, take-apart, and compare situations to develop meaning for the operations of addition and subtraction, and to develop strategies to solve arithmetic problems with these operations. Students understand connections between counting and addition and subtraction (e.g., adding two is the same as counting on two). They use properties of addition to add whole numbers and to create and use increasingly sophisticated strategies based on these properties (e.g., “making tens”) to solve addition and subtraction problems within 20. By comparing a variety of solution strategies, children build their understanding of the relationship between addition and subtraction.
  2. Students develop, discuss, and use efficient, accurate, and generalizable methods to add within 100 and subtract multiples of 10. They compare whole numbers (at least to 100) to develop understanding of and solve problems involving their relative sizes. They think of whole numbers between 10 and 100 in terms of tens and ones (especially recognizing the numbers 11 to 19 as composed of a ten and some ones). Through activities that build number sense, they understand the order of the counting numbers and their relative magnitudes.
  3. Students develop an understanding of the meaning and processes of measurement, including underlying concepts such as iterating (the mental activity of building up the length of an object with equal-sized units) and the transitivity principle for indirect measurement.1
  4. 4. Students compose and decompose plane or solid figures (e.g., put two triangles together to make a quadrilateral) and build understanding of part-whole relationships as well as the properties of the original and composite shapes. As they combine shapes, they recognize them from different perspectives and orientations, describe their geometric attributes, and determine how they are alike and different, to develop the background for measurement and for initial understandings of properties such as congruence and symmetry.

Grade 1 Overview

Operations and Algebraic Thinking

  • Represent and solve problems involving addition and subtraction.
  • Understand and apply properties of operations and the relationship between addition and subtraction.
  • Add and subtract within 20.
  • Work with addition and subtraction equations.

Number and Operations in Base Ten

  • Extend the counting sequence.
  • Understand place value.
  • Use place value understanding and properties of operations to add and subtract.

Measurement and Data

  • Measure lengths indirectly and by iterating length units.
  • Tell and write time.
  • Represent and interpret data.

Geometry

  • Reason with shapes and their attributes.

Mathematical Practices

  1. Make sense of problems and persevere in solving them.
  2. Reason abstractly and quantitatively.
  3. Construct viable arguments and critique the reasoning of others.
  4. Model with mathematics.
  5. Use appropriate tools strategically.
  6. Attend to precision.
  7. Look for and make use of structure.
  8. Look for and express regularity in repeated reasoning

The site https://www.ixl.com/standards/common-core/math/grade-1 expands on these expectations. This is an example of the curriculum expected to proceed from the Common Core standards — a mostly rational curriculum that I also recommend skimming, keeping in mind that this is for a six-year-old in 180 days of school. You might pause and read place value, data interpretation and geometry more slowly.

1.OA Operations and Algebraic Thinking

1.NBT Number and Operations in Base Ten

1.MD Measurement and Data

1.G Geometry

For kids with a stratospheric or even strong mathematical midichlorian count, these standards may make perfect sense. But the Common Core demands here represent no small mountain for an average six-year-old to climb. If the Force is strong in some kids, by implication that Force must be weaker in others.

If you grab random kids off the desert sands, throw them into pod racers, and yell, “Fly!!”, you will end up standing by a field littered with dead kids and wrecked pod racers.

If you force every child in school to tackle all these standards during their first formal school year, you will see a similar effect.

Eduhonesty and my take on these standards: Even when well-administered, I expect the above standards will lead many young children to decide they are “bad” at math. These kids won’t be clamoring to enter the pod race later. They will be trying to stay as far away from math as possible. Mostly, they will be trying to remain unnoticed as the teacher scans the room in search of raised hands that want to answer critical thinking questions. Some of these kids may be done with math — at six years of age. The right teacher may be able to pull these kids back into the game — but what if they never get that teacher? Children vary in their flexibility and malleability. Some kids decide at three years of age that they hate ketchup and never, ever change their mind.

I HATE MATH can become a mantra of sorts. When that mantra has been repeated too many times, I HATE MATH becomes a force in itself, a barrier a kid puts up for self-protection that teachers will be struggling to break through year by year, possibly for that kid’s entire school career.

If we had an educational Razzie awards category for “So Damn Dumb I Almost Can’t Believe It,” I would enter the early elementary Common Core math standards.